|
PROBLEM: Wetlands
are a critical part of a watershed=s ability to filter out pollutants,
as well as provide wildlife and waterfowl habitat. To date more than
90 percent of the Anacostia's tidal wetlands and nearly 70 percent
of its freshwater non-tidal wetlands have been destroyed or altered
(Figures 34 and 35).
 |
| Figure
35. Northeast and Northwest Branches Confluence (foreground)
with the Anacostia River. |
It
is estimated that more than 6,500 acres of tidal and non-tidal wetlands
have been lost from the watershed due to historic land conversion
to agriculture, urban development, and filling and dredging along
the tidal river (Figure 36). Almost 50 percent of the remaining acreage
is classified as open water wetlands, which generally provide very
specific and often limited habitat function.
 |
| Figure
36. Changes in Wetland Acreage Over Time (modified from Warner,
1996). |
STRATEGY: Permit
no further net loss of wetlands in the watershed, restore the ecological
integrity and function of existing degraded wetland areas, and create
opportunities to establish several hundred acres of new tidal and
non-tidal wetlands throughout the watershed.
PROGRESS:
Tidal
Wetland Restoration
The
D.C. Department of Public Works, the Environmental Protection Agency,
the National Park Service and the Metropolitan Washington Council
of Governments initiated efforts to restore Kenilworth Marsh, a tidal
freshwater system. Their efforts were successfully merged in late
1992 with a nearby ongoing U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Anacostia
River dredging project which placed 130,000 cubic yards of dredge
spoil material from the river into the marsh, resulting in the creation
of 32 acres of emergent marshland. This effort represents the largest
tidal freshwater marsh restoration project in the nation to date (Figures
37 and 38).
|
|
| Figure
37. Kenilworth Marsh Before Restoration, 1992. |
| |
|
|
| Figure
38. Kenilworth Marsh after Restoration, Fall 1993. |
Through
the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers= Anacostia Feasibility Study (1994),
designs have been undertaken to restore Kingman Lake, a similar system
to the Kenilworth Marsh, located on the same river reach. Lessons
learned from the Kenilworth experience will be transferred to this
project (approximately 46 acres of emergent wetland are planned).
Also
identified in the Corps of Engineer=s Anacostia Feasibility Study
is the creation of an additional 30 acres of emergent river fringe
wetlands to be located in the vicinity of nearby Kingman Lake. Though
originally part of the Anacostia Feasibility Study project scope for
the District of Columbia, due to funding considerations, this element
will probably be phased to be a part of future initiatives.
Constructed
Wetlands
Overall,
approximately 138 acres of constructed wetlands have either been completed,
or are currently in progress, within the Anacostia watershed.
In
1993, the Prince George=s County Department of Environmental Resources,
in cooperation with the U.S. Department of Agriculture=s Beltsville
Agricultural Research Center and the Washington Metropolitan Area
Transit Authority, constructed 19 acres of non-tidal wetlands in Beaverdam
Creek.
Prince
George=s County with assistance from the Maryland Department of the
Environment, recently initiated efforts to design and construct a
0.5 acre wetland marsh facility in the Fairmount Heights area of the
county. The project will both help reduce pollution from stormwater
before it enters the Anacostia, as well as enhance wildlife habitat.
Retrofit
Pond Fringe Wetland Creation
From
1989 to 1990, the Montgomery County Department of Environmental Protection,
in cooperation with the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning
Commission and the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments,
created a total of 1.1 acres of fringe wetland habitat in four stormwater
management ponds. Both emergent and submerged species, such as wild
rice, common three square, soft-stem bulrush, arrowhead, wild celery,
etc., were successfully incorporated in the plantings.
Wetlands
Regulation and Mitigation
The
Maryland Department of Natural Resources asserted new authority in
1992 to further protect non-tidal wetland areas; they are also evaluating
ways to transfer wetland mitigation requirements to expand watershed-wide
restoration efforts.
 |
| Figure
39. Vernal Pool Water Quality Monitoring - Sligo Creek Watershed,
1994. |
Amphibian
Reintroduction
As
part of a larger Sligo Creek restoration effort, the Montgomery County
Department of Environmental Protection, Maryland Department of the
Environment, Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission
and the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments constructed
in 1991 and 1993 both vernal pool and shallow marsh habitat areas
for the re-establishment of native amphibian populations (Figure 39).
By 1995, utilization of the created habitat areas by six species had
been documented (i.e., spring peeper, wood frog, green frog, bull
frog, American toad and spotted salamander).
|